OutcomesCouncilGeniusJargon
Get Ugenie

Your ask is AI’s task.

Get Ugenie

Ugenie

OutcomesCouncilGeniusJoin the waitlistContact

Legal

Terms of usePrivacy noticeCookie policy

Part of the V.ONE Venture Studio portfolio.

© 2026 Ugenie AI LTD (trading as “Ugenie”). Registered in England and Wales, company number 16331448. Registered office: Bartle House, 9 Oxford Court, Manchester, M2 3WQ, United Kingdom.

Get Ugenie
← All jargonJargon

Jargon:Doomer

1 min read

Do

Say this at the party

“A doomer is someone who thinks advanced AI has a real chance of going catastrophically wrong for humanity, and wants us to slow down or stop.”

Hype meter: Half realReal worries, unproven odds.

In plain English

Doomers believe that if we build AI much smarter than us before we know how to control it, things could go very badly, even to the point of human extinction.

Views range widely. Some put the chance at a few per cent and want careful rules. Others think it's very likely and want building to stop. People often share their guess as a number called "p(doom)".

Critics say these fears distract from present-day AI harms, or overrate how close powerful AI is. The opposite camp is often called accelerationists.

Where it came from

The label took off around 2023, after the release of GPT-4, when leading AI researchers signed a one-line statement saying the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority. Many people given the label prefer terms like "AI safety" or "AI risk".

See it in action

At dinner, Leah says her p(doom) is 10%. Her brother asks what that means, and she explains she thinks there's a one-in-ten chance advanced AI ends very badly, so she backs stricter safety rules.

What people get wrong

  • Doomers aren't anti-technology in general. Many work in AI and love it. They worry about one specific kind of very powerful system.
  • It's often used as an insult. Many people with these concerns don't call themselves doomers.

Go deeper

  • ArticleWikipediaP(doom)Explains the "p(doom)" number doomers and others use, where it came from, and its critics.
  • PostCenter for AI Safety, 2023Statement on AI Extinction RiskThe one-sentence 2023 statement on AI extinction risk signed by many leading researchers.
  • ArticleAlex Wilhelm, TechCrunch, 2023Effective accelerationism, doomers, decels, and how to flaunt your AI priorsA handy map of the AI camps, from doomers to accelerationists.
  • BookWikipedia, on Yudkowsky and Soares, 2025If Anyone Builds It, Everyone DiesAbout the 2025 bestseller that makes the strongest doomer case, with its reception.

Related jargon

AI alignmentAI safetyArtificial General Intelligence (AGI)Superintelligence

Drafted with AI. The AI Council (Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini) gave counsel. Phin signed it off.

More jargon

  • FM
    Jargon

    Jargon:Force multiplier

    “Anything that lets a person or team get far more done than their size suggests. AI is the big one now: it amplifies what you do, it doesn't replace you.”

    Hype meter: Mostly realSound smart →
  • ZoOG
    Jargon

    Jargon:Zone of Operating Genius (ZoOG)

    “The work only you do brilliantly, and that gives you energy back. Hand everything else to people or AI, so you can spend your days there.”

    Hype meter: Half realSound smart →
  • Cl
    Jargon

    Jargon:Clanker

    “"Clanker" is slang for a robot or AI, borrowed from Star Wars. People use it to mock bots, and it caught on in 2025.”

    Hype meter: Mostly realSound smart →